Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 86 No. 4 August 1965, pp. 415-423
Copyright © 1965 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirinit, K.
Right arrow Articles by King, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirinit, K.
Right arrow Articles by King, K. W.

Nutritional Value of Haitian Cereal-Legume Blends1

Kosol Sirinit2, Abdel-Gawad M. Soliman, Ali T. van Loo and Kendall W. King

Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia

The nutritional value of various beans indigenous to Haiti was evaluated in the rat, both as a sole source of protein and when blended with rice, sorghum, or corn. For the beans alone maximal PER and feed efficiency were observed at 15 to 18% dietary protein. Arnino acid supplementation of bean protein confirmed, in general, the deficiencies predicted from chemical analysis, the conspicuous exception being failure of added isoleucine to stimulate growth. Blends of beans with cereals showed maximal PER and feed efficiency when beans constituted 20 to 30% of the mixture, the higher level being particularly advantageous with sorghum. Amino acid supplementation of the blends resulted in growth responses generally predicted from chemical analysis. The quality of the protein in most of the blends was significantly inferior to casein, but comparable to Incaparina. The ability of the blends to contribute to human nutrient requirements other than for protein and calories was evaluated by comparing composition with National Research Council recommendations.


1 Supported by the Williams-Waterman Fund, Research Corporation, New York, New York.

2 Present address: U.S. Army Medical Research and Nutrition Laboratory, Irradiated Foods, Chemical Division, Fitzsimons General Hospital, Denver, Colorado.

Manuscript received 5 February 1965.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]