Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 86 No. 1 May 1965, pp. 23-28
Copyright © 1965 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiemchaisri, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiemchaisri, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, P. H.

Certain Factors including Fluoride which affect Magnesium Calcinosis in the Dog and Rat1

Y. Chiemchaisri and Paul H. Phillips

Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

The studies herein reported confirm in part observations previously made and indicate further that certain interrelationships between Mg, Ca, P and F- were involved in the low Mg induced calcinosis. A balance of these elements was essential for its prevention and control. Dietary F- greatly reduces, or largely prevents calcinosis in the dog, whereas the rat is less likely to show a reduction of excessive calcification of low Mg-induced calcinosis. The evidence at this time suggests a species differences. Minimal prevention level in the dog was 25 ppm F-. This effect was independent of feed intake. From the results in the response of calcinosis in dogs by fluoride treatment during magnesium depletion and 25-day repletion, it appeared that fluoride prevented the initiation of the calcification of soft tissues but it had no effect on the preformed calcified lesions during the course of 25-day repletion period.


1 The authors are indebted to Wilson and Company, Chicago, for partial support of this project.

Manuscript received 4 December 1964.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]