Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 85 No. 4 April 1965, pp. 419-425
Copyright © 1965 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Block, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Steele, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Block, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Steele, B. F.

Excretion of Histidine and Histidine Derivatives by Human Subjects Ingesting Protein from Different Sources1

Walter D. Block, Richard W. Hubbard2 and Betty F. Steele

Department of Dermatology, Biochemical Research Laboratories, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

The 1-methylhistidine, histidine, 3-methylhistidine, anserine (ß-alanyl-1-methylhistidine), and carnosine (ß-alanylhistidine) content of urine from 5 subjects was determined by ion-exchange chromatography. Controlled diets containing 2 levels of protein were fed; one series contained protein from animal flesh; the other contained no flesh protein. More of the histidine derivatives were excreted by subjects eating the flesh protein diets than by those eating the non-flesh diets. The former subjects also responded to increased protein intake with increased excretion of the derivatives; the latter did not. 1-Methylhistidine excretion tended to parallel intake. Both of the dipeptides, anserine and carnosine, were present in the urine of all the subjects whether or not they were present in the diets; thus their source could be either exogenous or endogenous, or both. 3-Methylhistidine was not present in any of the foods analyzed (beef, chicken, milk, bread) but was present in the urine of all of the subjects. Its source is not known.


1 Supported in part by U. S. Public Health Service Grants GM-04413-09, AM-06825-02, and 5M01-FR-42-04.

2 Present address: Research Department, Beckman Instruments, Inc., Spinco Division, 1117 California Ave., Palo Alto, California.

Manuscript received 9 November 1964.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]