Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Nutrition Vol. 84 No. 1 September 1964, pp. 77-82
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chalupa, W.
Right arrow Articles by Stillions, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chalupa, W.
Right arrow Articles by Stillions, M. C.

Metabolic Aspects of Urea Utilization by Ruminant Animals1

William Chalupa2, J. L. Evans and M. C. Stillions3

Department of Animal Sciences, Rutgers — The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

Growing 267-kg steers were fed a low-nitrogen (N), semipurified diet with varying combinations of urea and corn gluten meal to supply either zero, 46 or 92% of the animals' N intake as urea. N balances were 20, 14 and 1 g/day for the respective diets. Fecal and urinary N excretions increased with increasing amounts of urea N in the diet. Other indices of N utilization followed similar trends. Although microbial activity (estimated by redox potential) was higher with urea-containing diets, measurement of ruminal ammonia and partition of the urinary N fraction indicated a loss of N by the animal as a result of ruminal ammonia concentration. Ruminal ammonia peak and biological value were inversely related. Evidently microbial protein synthesis was not comparable in rate to urea hydrolysis. The small change in ruminal ammonia concentration produced from corn gluten meal suggested that this protein is relatively insoluble or has a slow rate of release in the rumen. The inferiority of urea diets can therefore be explained as a combination of urea hydrolysis occurring at a faster rate than synthesis of microbial protein and a portion of less soluble N sources escaping rapid proteolysis in the rumen.

1 Paper of the Journal Series, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Rutgers — The State University, New Brunswick. Data presented are from a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment for the Ph.D. degree.

2 Present address: Department of Dairy Science, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.

3 Present address: Morris Research Laboratories, Topeka, Kansas.

Manuscript received 13 March 1964.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
W. A. Phillips and G. W. Horn
Intake and digestion of wheat forage by stocker calves and lambs
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2424 - 2429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]