Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 83 No. 3 July 1964, pp. 251-256
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friend, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friend, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cunningham, H. M.

Effects of Feeding Frequency on Metabolism, Rate and Efficiency of Gain and on Carcass Quality of Pigs1

D. W. Friend and H. M. Cunningham

Experimental Farm, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Nappan, Nova Scotia

The effect of feeding pigs a 2000-g ration and 5000 ml water in one or 5 meals daily was determined by metabolism, growth and carcass quality measurements. In the first experiment, with 50-kg pigs, differences in digestibility coefficients due to increased feeding frequency were negligible. The efficiency of calorie conversion to fat and protein gain, derived from nitrogen and carbon balances, was about 49% for both groups of pigs. The more frequently fed pigs eliminated more fecal but less urinary water than the pigs fed once daily. The same restricted feeding regimens used for the caged pigs in experiment 1 were applied to individually penned, 60-kg pigs in the second experiment. A higher rate of gain by the pigs fed once daily was attributed to the effect of "fill" as evidenced by lighter carcass weights and smaller carcass gains. No significant difference between the 2 groups of pigs could be shown by any of the carcass measurements taken which included specific density.


1 Contribution no. 160, Division of Animal and Poultry Science.

Manuscript received 6 March 1964.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]