Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, W. E.

Adaptation of the Chick to Dietary Energy Source1

W. E. Donaldson

Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, North Carolina

One-day-old chicks were maintained from 0 to 14 days with high-carbohydrate (CHO) or high-fat (fat) diets. The chicks were then given fatty acid or glucose labeled with C14 and placed in metabolism cages. Excreta and respiratory CO2 were collected for 24 hours to determine C14 dose retention and C14 O2 production. Production of C14 O2 was used as an index of fatty acid or glucose oxidation. Fat-fed chicks oxidized fatty acid at a maximal rate regardless of age, dietary choline level or dietary fatty acid level. The CHO-fed chicks oxidized fatty acid maximally at one day of age, but the rate decreased with age. Diet had no effect on the oxidation of glucose-C14. Feeding the fat diet to CHO-adapted chicks at the time of fatty acid-C14 administration resulted in an increase of fatty acid oxidation to levels comparable to fat adapted chicks. When glucose-C14 was administered, tissues of chicks fed the CHO diet contained approximately 3 times as much radioactivity in the fat-soluble fraction as did the tissues of chicks fed fat. The results are discussed in terms of growth response to dietary fat.


1 Contribution from the Poultry Science Department, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, North Carolina. Published with the approval of the Director of Research as paper no. 1653 of the Journal Series.

Manuscript received 1 July 1963.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1964 by American Society for Nutrition