Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 80 No. 3 July 1963, pp. 243-250
Copyright © 1963 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Breuer, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Loosli, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Breuer, L. H., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Loosli, J. K.

A Comparison of Several Amino Acid and Casein Diets for the Growing Rat1

L. H. Breuer, Jr., W. G. Pond, R. G. Warner and J. K. Loosli

Department of Animal Husbandry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Weight gains and feed consumption of weanling male rats were measured when fed purified diets containing either casein or one of six different amino acid mixtures, and accompanied by variations in the level of fat as well as source of carbohydrate and salts.

The casein diets (14 and 20%) were superior to any of the amino acid diets tested. The amino acid diet of Rechcigl et al. (7) containing 15.68% essential amino acids and no nonessential amino acids supported significantly better growth than the diets containing from 5.03 to 7.06% essential amino acids and nonessential amino acids to provide a total of from 12.00 to 19.45% total amino acids. Diets containing the amino acid mixture of Rama Rao et al. (8) with 12% fat and the mixture of Warner (9) supplying the lowest level of total amino acids, were inferior to the other amino acid diets tested. Similar performance was noted with diets containing the amino acid mixtures of Rechcigl et al. (6), Rama Rao et al. (8) with 2% fat, Warner (9) with a higher level of nonessential amino acids and with a diet containing a mixture of essential and nonessential amino acids intended to simulate casein. The significance of these results is discussed.

There appeared to be no difference between sucrose and a dextrin-glucose mixture as the carbohydrate source or the salt mixtures of Warner (9) and Jones and Foster (16) when used in diets containing either casein or the amino acid mixture of Rechcigl et al. (6).


1 Supported in part by a financial grant from Esso Research and Engineering Company, Linden, New Jersey.

Manuscript received 17 January 1963.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]