Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 8 No. 2 August 1934, pp. 197-219
Copyright © 1934 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swift, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Swift, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, E. B.

The Utilization of Energy Producing Nutriment and Protein as Affected by Individual Nutrient Deficiencies1

I. The Effects of Cystine Deficiency

Two Figures

R. W. Swift, O. J. Kahlenberg, LeRoy Voris and E. B. Forbes

Institute of Animal Nutrition, Pennsylvania State College

Twenty young growing rats were fed for 14 weeks, by the paired-feeding method, to demonstrate the ways in which cystine affects the utilization of food nitrogen and energy when added to a cystine-deficient diet.

The diets compared contained 8 per cent of protein, from skim milk powder; one diet was supplemented with 0.24 per cent of l-cystine.

Cystine deficiency unfavorably affected the appetite, but was without certain effect on the digestibility of the food protein.

The rats which received the additional 0.24 per cent of cystine made the greater growth, and stored 10.8 per cent more energy and 24.4 per cent more nitrogen than did the controls.

During the 14 weeks, the rats which received the cystine stored on the average 40.4 Cal. more than did the controls. This gain was accompanied by 29 Cal. less loss in heat, 8.6 Cal. less loss in feces, and 2.8 Cal. less loss in urine, by the rats which received the cystine supplement.

These differences in energy loss, when related to the gross energy of the diets, were 0.1 per cent as urine, 0.3 per cent as feces, and 1.0 per cent as heat.

The ratio of carbon to nitrogen in the urine was approximately 2.0, and did not differ significantly between the two groups. The unusual magnitude of this value was due to the low proportion of protein in the diet.


1 Publication authorized by the Director of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, January 8, 1934, as Technical Paper no. 627.

Manuscript received 17 January 1934.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]