Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 78 No. 1 September 1962, pp. 89-94
Copyright © 1962 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nesheim, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nesheim, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, D. T.

Studies on the Effect of Raw Soybean Meal on Fat Absorption in Young Chicks1

M. C. Nesheim, J. D. Garlich and D. T. Hopkins

Department of Poultry Husbandry and Graduate School of Nutrition, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

A series of experiments indicated that dietary raw soybean meal depressed fat absorption in chicks of two breeds at two weeks of age but not at four weeks of age. Apparently fat absorption is affected by raw meal feeding rather than digestion since absorption of soybean oil or soybean fatty acid was equally affected.

As little as 5% of protein from raw meal in a diet containing 25% of total crude protein was sufficient to cause nearly maximal depression of fat absorption. Changes in protein level of the diet could not influence fat absorption to the same extent as raw meal.

A crystalline preparation of "Kunitz" soybean trypsin inhibitor did not affect fat absorption when fed to chicks. Chicks receiving a diet containing heated soybean meal plus the trypsin inhibitor had an enlarged pancreas, grew more slowly and metabolized the diet slightly less than chicks fed a comparable diet containing heated meal.


1 This study was supported in part by a research grant of the National Soybean Processors' Association, Chicago, whose assistance is gratefully acknowledged.

Manuscript received 7 May 1962.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]