Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 73 No. 4 April 1961, pp. 369-373
Copyright © 1961 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchey, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchey, S. J.

Comparative Vitamin K Activity of Frozen, Irradiated and Heat-Processed Foods1

L. R. Richardson, Stella Wilkes and S. J. Ritchey

Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, The Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas

The vitamin K content of 6 foods which had been frozen, canned by conventional heat treatment, and irradiated with 2.79 and 5.58 megarads of gamma rays was obtained using the chick assay procedure. Foods assayed for vitamin K were asparagus, broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, green beans and spinach. The values for vitamin K activity were higher in some instances and lower in a few cases in the treated foods than in the frozen foods. Similar variations in values were obtained after the foods had been stored 15 months. These differences were attributed chiefly to variations in values obtained for different levels of a food and it was concluded that there was no appreciable difference in vitamin K activity caused by the method of preservation or by storage.


1 These studies were supported by the Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army under contract DA-49-007-MD-582. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of the Army.

Manuscript received 20 October 1960.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]