Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 73 No. 2 February 1961, pp. 191-198
Copyright © 1961 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calloway, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Munson, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Calloway, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Munson, A. H.

Response of Cereal-Fed Guinea Pigs to Dietary Broccoli Supplementation and X-Irradiation1

Doris Howes Calloway and A. H. Munson

Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, QM Research and Engineering Command, U. S. Army, Chicago, Illinois

Young, male, guinea pigs were fed a basal diet of bran and oats, with or without a daily supplement of 50 gm of raw broccoli, for two weeks before and after exposure to 400 r whole body x-radiation. Animals were killed sequentially for histologic and hematologic examination. Provision of broccoli resulted in improved nutriture, larger livers with higher stores of vitamin A and mimimal fatty changes, and superior gonadal development. Following irradiation in both groups, decrements in body weight and food intake as well as the characteristic events of the radiation syndrome were seen. Broccoli supplementation of the cereal diet generally reduced the degree of distortion or delayed its appearance.


1 This paper reports research undertaken at the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, QM Research and Engineering Command, U. S. Army, and has been assigned no. 2062 in the series of papers approved for publication. The views or conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors. They are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views or indorsement of the Department of Defense.

Manuscript received 3 October 1960.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]