Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 72 No. 2 October 1960, pp. 203-209
Copyright © 1960 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. E.

The Unique Role of Ascorbic Acid in Peripheral Vascular Physiology as Compared with Rutin and Hesperidin; a Micromanipulative Study1

Richard E. Lee

Department of Medicine, New York Hosital-Cornell University Medical Center, New York, New York

Using several previously established micromanipulative techniques, the peripheral vascular system has been studied in rats fed (1) a synthetic diet with and without rutin or hesperidin, and in guinea pigs fed (2) laboratory chow with added greens, (3) laboratory chow with greens and added rutin or hesperidin, (4) a synthetic diet with added vitamin C, with and without rutin or hesperidin, and (5) a synthetic diet devoid of ascorbic acid, with and without rutin or hesperidin. Increased susceptibility to "spontaneous" and induced hemorrhages in minute vessels proved to be unique in its association with ascorbic acid deficiency, regardless of whether the animals were fed supplements of either flavonoid. Neither gross signs of dietary deficiency nor any peripheral vascular phenomena were found that could be explained by a lack of rutin or hesperidin in the diet, or corrected by their supplementation.


1 This study was supported by the Nutrition Foundation, Inc., New York, and by the A. H. Robins Company, Richmond, Virginia.

Manuscript received 4 March 1960.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]