Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 72 No. 2 October 1960, pp. 153-162
Copyright © 1960 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Summers, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Summers, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, H.

The Nutritional Requirements of the Protein-Depleted Chicken

I. Effect of Different Protein Depletion Regimes on Body Composition During Depletion, Repletion and Redepletion1

J. D. Summers and Hans Fisher

Department of Poultry Science, Rutgers—The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

Three groups of growing chickens were depleted to two thirds of their starting body weight by (a) complete starvation, (b) feeding a nitrogen-free diet, and (c) feeding a gelatin-containing diet. They were then repleted to their starting body weight and to twice the initial body weight. Finally they were starved for a 6-day period. Carcass and liver composition analyses were carried out at each interval for each of the three treatment groups as well as for a control group of chicks that received a standard ration throughout except for the final period when they too were starved.

1. During initial depletion chicks in the nitrogen-free group lost the greatest amount of carcass nitrogen but simultaneously increased in carcass and liver fat compared with the other treatments. Collagen content did not decrease during initial depletion on any regime.
2. On repletion to the starting weight, there was a lag in carcass nitrogen accretion in all treatment groups compared with the nondepleted controls. A similar but more pronounced lag occurred in collagen growth during the repletion period. By contrast, the liver nitrogen increased over threefold compared with that of the control animals for the same period.
3. On repletion to twice the starting weight the body composition of all 4 groups was essentially the same.
4. During the redepletion-by-starvation period, chicks in the previously-starved group lost more carcass nitrogen than those in either the control or the other two treatment groups. On the other hand, the nitrogen-free group conserved body nitrogen, as shown by a loss in carcass nitrogen that was only half that of the previously-starved group. In contrast with the unchanged collagen content of the carcass during the initial depletion period on all regimes, there was a loss of 20% of collagen during final starvation.


1 Paper of the Journal Series, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, New Brunswick. Supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the National Science Foundation.

Manuscript received 18 May 1960.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]