Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 70 No. 2 February 1960, pp. 187-192
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullrey, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Luecke, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullrey, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Luecke, R. W.

The Requirement of the Baby Pig for Orally Administered Iron1

D. E. Ullrey, E. R. Miller, O. A. Thompson, I. M. Ackermann, D. A. Schmidt, J. A. Hoefer and R. W. Luecke2

Michigan State University, East Lansing

Forty-five baby pigs were fed a synthetic milk diet (25 parts of iron per million parts of solids) supplemented with zero, 10, 50, 100 or 200 parts of ferrous iron (FeSO4·7H2O) per million parts of solids. The following observations were made at weekly or biweekly intervals: weight gain, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, erythrocyte count, reticulocyte count, leucocyte count, total serum protein, serum protein electrophoretic pattern, serum iron concentration, unbound iron-binding capacity of serum, total iron-binding capacity of serum and percentage saturation of transferrin with iron. Iron balance studies, bone marrow biopsies and tissue analyses were also performed. Under the specified conditions, 125 ppm of oral iron appear adequate for the baby pig.


1 Published with the approval of the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Article no. 2455.

2 The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of R. E. Samson and E. D. Purkhiser in feed formulation and animal care, and of R. M. Diener in performing the bone-marrow biopsies.

Manuscript received 22 June 1959.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]