Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 66 No. 3 November 1958, pp. 321-332
Copyright © 1958 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Browning, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fountaine, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Browning, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fountaine, F. C.

Effect of Feeding Low Levels of Diethylstilbestrol on Gestation and Lactation of Rats1,2,

C. B. Browning, D. B. Parrish and F. C. Fountaine

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan

Nineteen adult female albino rats and their litters (168 pups) were used to study some of the effects of feeding low levels of DES (0.6, 1.1, or 2.2 µg/100 gm body weight/day) for three days prior to breeding, and during gestation and lactation.

The feeding of DES did not appear to have a measurable effect on conception or gestation. However, growth of the young of lactating rats receiving DES in their rations was retarded significantly (P < 0.01), indicating decreased lactation by females receiving food containing DES. Uteri of weanling females from treated dams were not stimulated, as judged by the uterine-weight-response method, indicating that estrogens were not excreted via the mammary gland in detectable quantities.

Although there was a trend toward decreased total food intake by rats receiving DES during gestation and lactation, food intake apparently was sufficient for lactation, since all lactating females gained weight.


1 Contribution no. 569, Department of Chemistry and no. 263, Department of Dairy Husbandry, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. These data are to be submitted as a part of a thesis by the senior author to the Graduate School of Kansas State College of Agriculture and Applied Science, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Nutrition.

2 The authors express their appreciation to H. T. Gier and E. H. Herrick, Department of Zoology, for assistance during this study.

Manuscript received 22 May 1958.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]