Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 62 No. 2 June 1957, pp. 255-267
Copyright © 1957 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, J. W.

Studies on the Effect of Antibiotics on the Intestinal Weights of Chicks1

C. H. Hill, A. D. Keeling and J. W. Kelly

Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State College, Raleigh

The results of the experiments presented in this report indicate that the small intestine is more sensitive to the antibiotics used than is the whole body as reflected by body weight because (1) the small intestine decreased in weight before an increase was noted in body weight, and (2) lower levels of the antibiotic which did not increase body weight caused a decrease in intestinal weight.

High levels of penicillin completely counteracted the body growth retardation and relative intestinal weight stimulation of unheated soybean meal fed at a level of 10% of the total diet, but did not completely counteract these effects when the level of unheated soybean meal was increased to 30 or 40%.

The inclusion of fibrous materials, alfalfa and wheat bran, at a level of 10% of the total diet did not significantly affect the response of the small intestine or body weight to penicillin.

It is suggested that the findings presented in this report cast some doubt on the possibility that there exists a causal relationship between the effect of antibiotics on the small intestine and the growth response usually observed when antibiotics are fed.


1 Contribution from the Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, as Journal Paper 777.

Manuscript received 28 December 1956.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]