Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 59 No. 2 June 1956, pp. 223-234
Copyright © 1956 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Firth, J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Firth, J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. C.

Quantitative Relationships of Tryptophan and Nicotinic Acid in the Baby Pig1

One Figure

Jay Firth and B. Connor Johnson

Division of Animal Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana

The relationship between the requirements of the baby pig for L-tryptophan, DL-tryptophan and nicotinic acid were studied using a hydrolyzed casein synthetic milk diet containing 28% of protein.

1. The requirement of the baby pig for DL-tryptophan is approximately 0.29% of the dry matter of the diet when an excess of nicotinic acid is present.
2. The requirement of the baby pig for L-tryptophan in the presence of an excess of nicotinic acid is 0.19% of the dry matter of the diet. The difference between the L and DL requirements implies that about 1/3 of the unnatural isomer can be used for growth.
3. The nicotinic acid requirement for maximum growth is near 20 mg per kilogram of diet when 0.3% of DL-tryptophan is present in the diet.
4. The DL-tryptophan requirement is increased to approximately 0.45% of the diet when nicotinic acid is absent.


1 The data reported in this paper are taken from a thesis submitted to the Graduate College of the University of Illinois in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Nutrition.

Manuscript received 5 December 1955.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]