Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 57 No. 2 October 1955, pp. 249-260
Copyright © 1955 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guggenheim, K.
Right arrow Articles by Diamant, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guggenheim, K.
Right arrow Articles by Diamant, E. J.

Effect of Riboflavin and Choline Deficiencies on Water Metabolism in Rats

K. Guggenheim and E. J. Diamant

Laboratory of Nutrition, Department of Biochemistry, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel

1. Rats maintained on a diet deficient in riboflavin or in choline exhibit a delayed diuretic response to a water load.
2. In vitro experiments showed that the ability of the liver to inactivate pitressin is not impaired in riboflavin deficiency. Injection of cortisone or ACTH, which are without any effect on the diuresis of normal hydrated rats, increased urine excretion in deficient animals.
3. Livers of choline-deficient rats maintained on either a low- or high-fat diet, possess a diminished pitressin-inactivating ability. Caloric deficiency imposed on rats kept on a choline-deficient, high-fat diet reduced the fat content and simultaneously improved the pitressin-inactivating capacity of the liver. Vitamin B12 and aureomycin likewise restored the impaired ability of the liver to destroy pitressin; they had, however, no lipotropic effect.


Manuscript received 16 May 1955.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]