Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 51 No. 4 December 1953, pp. 479-490
Copyright © 1953 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tappan, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Elvehjem, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tappan, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Elvehjem, C. A.

Studies Concerning the Pyridoxine Requirements of Rats Receiving Highly Processed Rations1

D. V. Tappan, U. J. Lewis, A. H. Methfessel and C. A. Elvehjem

Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison

The high vitamin B6 requirement of animals receiving highly processed rations has been studied by means of the combat ration, type K. In this regimen the ham and egg and the pork units seem to be associated with the unusual vitamin needs which the ration fosters. These protein constitutents, however, do not increase the vitamin B6 need of the animals in the absence of the other portions of the ration. Improvement in the ration by means of proper substitution, especially for the pork unit, has been demonstrated to be possible.

The unusual vitamin requirements which result from the use of processed rations and the nutritional significance of such rations are considered.


1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

This paper reports research undertaken in cooperation with the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, and has been assigned number 441 in the series of papers approved for publication. The views or conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors. They are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views or indorsement of the Department of Defense.

Manuscript received 10 August 1953.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]