Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 51 No. 4 December 1953, pp. 469-477
Copyright © 1953 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tappan, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Elvehjem, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tappan, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Elvehjem, C. A.

Observations on the Nutrition of Rhesus Monkeys Receiving Highly Processed Rations1

One Figure

D. V. Tappan and C. A. Elvehjem

Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison

The 5-in-1 type of combat ration, which consists of a generous variety of processed foods, has been shown capable of maintaining a state of health in monkeys for periods of up to two years with minor vitamin supplementation. Folic acid and pyridoxine are required by this species in addition to the crystalline vitamins added during the manufacture of the ration. The folic acid inadequacy is largely a reflection of the high requirement of monkeys. The general significance of the pyridoxine deficiency precipitated in animals by highly processed rations is discussed.

The injection of antibiotics to assist in controlling secondary complications during times of deficiency has proved to be a useful innovation in nutritional studies employing monkeys.


1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

This paper reports research undertaken in cooperation with the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, and has been assigned number 442 in the series of papers approved for publication. The views or conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors. They are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views or indorsement of the Department of Defense.

Manuscript received 10 August 1953.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]