Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 51 No. 1 September 1953, pp. 85-95
Copyright © 1953 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westerfeld, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Richert, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westerfeld, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Richert, D. A.

Distribution of the Xanthine Oxidase Factor (Molybdenum) in Foods1

One Figure

W. W. Westerfeld and Dan A. Richert

Department of Biochemistry, State University of New York Medical College, Syracuse

Foods were assayed for available molybdenum by determining the intestinal xanthine oxidase response to the incorporation of the food into an otherwise purified Mo-deficient diet. When the results were compared with the total Mo determined chemically, 50 to 100% of the dietary Mo was usually available for the biological response.

Foods considered to be good sources of Mo (arbitrarily containing more than 0.6 p.p.m. of available Mo on a dry weight basis) included:

(1) legumes,
(2) cereal grains
(3) some dark green leafy vegetables, and
(4) liver, kidney and spleen among the animal tissues.
Fruits, berries and most root or stem vegetables were relatively poor sources of Mo, inasmuch as they contained less than 0.1 p.p.m. Brewers' yeasts were good sources of Mo and bakers' yeasts were poor sources, even though the growth media in both cases were not rich in Mo.


1 This study was aided by grants from the Nutrition Foundation, Inc., and the American Cancer Society upon recommendation of the Committee on Growth of the National Research Council.

Manuscript received 22 April 1953.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]