Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 49 No. 2 February 1953, pp. 261-275
Copyright © 1953 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harper, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Katayama, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harper, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Katayama, M. C.

The Influence of Various Carbohydrates on the Utilization of Low Protein Rations by the White Rat1

I. Comparison of Sucrose and Cornstarch in 9% Casein Rations

A. E. Harper and M. C. Katayama

Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

The influence of sucrose and that of cornstarch on the utilization by the white rat of low casein rations supplemented with methionine have been determined. Cornstarch supported better growth of rats receiving 9% casein rations than did sucrose. The growth differences were eliminated by increasing either the level of casein or the levels of 5 essential amino acids in the sucrose ration but were unchanged when liver extract was included, when the quantities of the B vitamins were increased or when certain non-essential amino acids were included.

The growth of rats fed low casein rations deficient in methionine was also shown to be better when cornstarch was substituted for sucrose as the source of carbohydrate.

Various explanations for these observations have been discussed. The growth differences observed cannot be explained satisfactorily by differences in palatability of the rations, by the influence of protein present in cornstarch or by a deficiency of an unknown growth factor. They are apparently due to the availability of greater quantities of certain essential amino acids when sucrose is replaced by cornstarch. It seems improbable that intestinal microorganisms play a significant role in this regard and it is deemed more likely that cornstarch, by reducing the rate of passage of the ration through the gastrointestinal tract, promotes more efficient utilization of low casein rations.


1 This work was supported by a grant (no. 55) from the Medical Research Committee of the University of Alberta.

We are indebted to Dr. R. J. Allgeier, U. S. Industrial Chemical Coroporation, Baltimore, Maryland, for the bacitracin-vitamin B12 concentrate and to Sharp and Dohme (Canada), Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, for sulfasuxidine.

Manuscript received 22 August 1952.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. Yudkin
Dietetic Aspects of Atherosclerosis
Angiology, February 1, 1966; 17(2): 127 - 133.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]