Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 48 No. 2 October 1952, pp. 257-293
Copyright © 1952 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DuBois, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, E. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DuBois, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, E. I.

Basal Heat Production and Elimination of Thirteen Normal Women at Temperatures from 22°C. to 35°C.1

Sixteen Figures

Eugene F. DuBois, Franklin G. Ebaugh, Jr., James D. Hardy, G. F. Soderstrom2 and E. Irene Stevens

The Russell Sage Institute of Pathology in affiliation with the New York Hospital and Department of Physiology, Cornell University Medical College, New York City

Seventy-six experiments in the Sage respiration calorimeter were made on 13 normal young women at environmental temperatures between 22°C. and 35°C. The measurements in hourly periods included heat production, respiration quotient, rectal temperature, average surface temperature, total heat loss, conductance and the percentages of heat lost by radiation, convection and vaporization. Careful note was made of muscle tensing, shivering and sensations of cold, warmth and comfort.

The average basal metabolism of the 13 women was 31.2 cal. per square meter per hour. This is so much lower than the heat production of men per unit of surface that women have an advantage over men in the warm zones and do not need to sweat as much. In the cold zone some, but not all, women lose heat less rapidly than men.

In the cold zone the women lost about 67% of their heat by radiation and this percentage dropped in linear fashion to zero when the calorimeter temperature was the same as skin temperature. Vaporization accounted for only 16–18% of the total loss at the coldest temperatures and reached the conventional figures of 24–25% only at environments of 27°C.–28°C. It is obvious that fixed percentage figures for radiation, convection and vaporization apply to only one strictly specified set of conditions.

The comfort or neutral zone for women, naked, and in strict basal conditions, extended from about 26°C. to 30.9°C. In this zone the average skin temperature was 33.9°C. and in the upper part of the zone heat production closely approximated heat elimination. Of the 10 women studied at temperatures of 28 and below, 6 showed an increase in metabolism in the cold greater than the amount that could be ascribed to muscle tension or restlessness. This is evidence that some but not all women are subject to Rubner's "chemical regulation" of metabolism but the amount involved is small.

In the cold zone the peripheral tissues lost so much heat that the average temperature of the body dropped 2.8°C. before the onset of shivering. The metabolism of the peripheral tissues falls with lower temperatures. Since the total metabolism remains constant or rises there must be an increase in the metabolism of the core of the body which compensates for the decrease in the periphery. In this sense there is a chemical regulation in men and women.


1 Clinical Calorimetry Paper, no. 55.

2 G. F. Soderstrom died in October, 1948, at the age of 73. His services to calorimetry had been noteworthy. He built the Sage respiration calorimeter in 1912 and for 35 years operated the control table. He devised and constructed many new pieces of apparatus, these, like his techniques, always a little better than necessary. He took an active part in all experiments and he was the joint author of many papers.

Manuscript received 22 July 1952.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]