Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 46 No. 1 January 1952, pp. 109-122
Copyright © 1952 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esselbaugh, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hard, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Esselbaugh, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hard, M. M.

The Replacement Value of the Alaska Field Pea (Pisum Sativum) for Human Subjects1

Nettie C. Esselbaugh, Hazel C. Murray2, Laurine W. Hardie and Margaret M. Hard

Department of Home Economics, Washington Agricultural Experiment Stations, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, The State College of Washington, Pullman

1. The replacement value of the protein of the Alaska split pea (Pisum sativum) has been compared with that of egg protein. Six young adult women served as subjects.
2. Pea protein was slightly less efficient than egg protein for the human adult subject. The average daily nitrogen balance on the egg diet was -0.10 gm, while that on the pea diet was -0.31 gm. This difference was not statistically significant.
3. The egg replacement value of the pea protein was found to be 95.1%. This indicates that the split pea is a protein food of high biological value for human consumption.
4. When the daily methionine intake was increased to 2.06 gm by supplementation of the pea diet with 1.5 gm of DL-methionine, the egg replacement value for the pea protein was 100% or better for all subjects. If this replacement value is expressed in terms of the positive nitrogen balance obtained in contrast to that on the egg regimen, the average value becomes 110.9%.
5. The average apparent digestibility of egg was 85.6%, of peas 78.8%, and of peas plus methionine 80.0%.
6. Methionine supplements added to the pea diet increased nitrogen retention. The daily nitrogen balances of all subjects were positive during this period, resulting in an average value of + 0.55 gm. This utilization was significantly better at the 1% level when compared with that obtained on either the egg or the pea diet.
7. The average urinary excretion of methionine for each subject was about the same during the egg and pea periods. When the amount of methionine was increased 4 times as a supplement to peas, excretion of this amino acid was approximately doubled.


1 Scientific Paper 1054, Washington Agricultural Experiment Stations, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, The State College of Washington, Pullman.

2 Present address: Department of Home Economics, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

Manuscript received 29 August 1951.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]