Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leichsenring, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Patton, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leichsenring, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Patton, M. B.

The Effect of Level of Intake on Calcium and Phosphorus Metabolism in College Women1,2,

Jane M. Leichsenring, Loana M. Norris and Sara A. Lamison

School of Home Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul

Eva Donelson Wilson3 and Mary Brown Patton

School of Home Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus

Calcium and phosphorus metabolism were studied on 17 college women from two states. Five subjects, two in Ohio and three in Minnesota, were maintained for a period of 8 weeks on a basal diet which supplied approximately 300 mg of calcium and 800 mg of phosphorus daily. A second group of 6 subjects, three in Ohio and three in Minnesota, were maintained on the basal diet for 4 weeks. This was followed immediately by a 4-week period during which the basal diet was supplemented by 1,200 mg calcium, making the total calcium intake 1,500 mg daily. A third group of 6 subjects, following the 4-week period on the basal diet, received supplements of calcium and phosphorus, making the total intake 1,500 mg of calcium and 1,400 mg of phosphorus.

One week was shown statistically to be an adequate period for adjustment to the calcium and phosphorus levels in the basal diet. Negative calcium balances were observed on the basal diet, whereas more positive than negative phosphorus balances were noted.

Increasing the calcium intake from 300 mg to 1,500 mg without altering the phosphorus intake resulted in a statistically significant increase in calcium retention. Urinary calcium excretion also increased significantly. Phosphorus retention, however, was unchanged, but there was a decrease in the urinary excretion of this element.

When supplements of both calcium and phosphorus were added to the basal diet, calcium retention was somewhat greater than on the unsupplemented basal diet but was very much less than when the basal diet was supplemented with calcium alone. Phosphorus retention, on the other hand, was not influenced by these changes in calcium and phosphorus intake.

Within the limits of the calcium and phosphorus intake levels employed in this investigation, the amount of phosphorus in the diet would appear to be a factor of considerable importance in determining calcium utilization in adult subjects.


1 Paper 2295, Scientific Journal Series. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Journal Article J-24-51, Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station.

3 Present address: School of Home Economics, Pennsylvania State College.

Manuscript received 1 June 1951.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Sodium Metaphosphate, Sodium Trimetaphosphate, and Sodium Hexametaphosphate
International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 2001; 20(3_suppl): 75 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
R. S. Harris and A. E. Nizel
Metabolic Significance of the Ratio of Calcium to Phosphorus in Foods and Diets
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 1964; 43(6): 1090 - 1097.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. A. GOLDSMITH, W. G. UNGLAUB, and J. GIBBENS
RECENT ADVANCES IN NUTRITION AND METABOLISM: Review of the Literature, 1951
Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1952; 90(4): 513 - 561.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1951 by American Society for Nutrition