Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 44 No. 3 July 1951, pp. 399-411
Copyright © 1951 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fajans, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fajans, R. S.

The Supplemental Value of Cystine and Methionine for Low Protein (Casein) Diets Fed the Young White Rat1

Howard B. Lewis and Ruth Stine Fajans

Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

1. Varying amounts of L-cystine, DL-methionine, and these two sulfur-containing amino acids in mixture, were added to the diets of young white rats as supplements to a 7.5% casein diet (basal diet) which contained approximately 0.2% methionine and 0.03% cystine. Choline (as the hydrochloride) was added to all diets to provide a source of non-protein methyl groups.
2. A significant increase in the rate of growth was observed when cystine was added to the basal diet, despite the fact that the methionine content of this diet was considerably lower than the amount usually accepted as adequate. Increases in the rate of growth comparable to those obtained with the cystine supplement were observed when supplements of methionine or of mixtures of cystine and methionine in varying proportions were added to the basal diet. Essentially the same growth responses with diets of equal sulfur content were observed even though the cystine sulfur ranged from 4 to 75% of the total organic sulfur.
3. The supplementary value of cystine for the basal casein diet would indicate that, under the conditions of these experiments, the cystine requirements may exceed those for methionine. These requirements may be filled by cystine present in the diet or by cystine synthesized from dietary methionine. The data do not indicate that greater physiological economy is achieved by inclusion in the diet of cystine itself rather than methionine from which cystine may be synthesized.
4. Under the conditions of the present experiments, commerical lactalbumin was more effective in promoting the growth of young white rats than was casein (7.5%) in equivalent amounts (nitrogen content), despite the fact that the methionine content of the diet used in this study was less than that of any other diet in the series. In contrast to the results with the basal (7.5%) casein diet, it was not possible to increase significantly the rate of growth when lactalbumin was supplemented with DL-methionine or L-cystine.


1 These studies were supported in large part by grants from the National Dairy Council.

Manuscript received 25 January 1951.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]