Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 42 No. 3 November 1950, pp. 463-471
Copyright © 1950 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, G. M.

Niacin-Replacing Value of L- and DL-Tryptophan in Chick Diets as Influenced by Carbohydrate Source1

J. O. Anderson2, G. F. Combs and G. M. Briggs3

Department of Poultry Husbandry, University of Maryland, College Park

L- and DL-tryptophan were compared with respect to their ability to replace niacin in the diet of the chick. The L-isomer appeared to be the only one utilized by chick tissues. This isomer was found to be approximately twice as active as DL-tryptophan when the diet contained glucose as the source of carbohydrate. When starch replaced glucose in the diet, the D-tryptophan was of some value. The difference in value of the D-tryptophan when starch was substituted in place of glucose is believed to be the result of a change in the bacterial flora of the digestive tract. The value of the D-tryptophan was decreased by the addition of sulfasuxidine to the diet.

Replacing the glucose of the diet by starch decreased the growth rate except when niacin was added. Chicks fed niacin-adequate diets containing added sulfasuxidine grew more rapidly than those fed the same diet without sulfasuxidine.


1 Scientific paper A286. Contribution 2232 of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station (Department of Poultry Husbandry).

2 Present address: Merck and Co., Inc., Rahway, N. J.

3 Present address: Poultry Division, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.

Manuscript received 3 July 1950.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]