Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 41 No. 3 July 1950, pp. 433-446
Copyright © 1950 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. S.

The Effect of Phytate and other Food Factors on Iron Absorption1

Two Figures

Leon M. Sharpe2, Wendell C. Peacock3, Richard Cooke and Robert S. Harris

Departments of Biology, Food Technology and Physics of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, and the Fernald State School, Waverly, Massachusetts

1. The effect of 7 test meals upon the absorption of either reduced Fe55 or reduced Fe59 fed to adolescent boys was measured.
2. The test meals consisted of (I, VI) milk, rolled oats, tomato juice, white bread and omelet; (II) milk; (III) milk and sodium phytate; (IV, VII) milk and rolled oats; and (V) water. Each meal contained approximately the same amount of iron. Meals I, VI and VII contained the same level of natural phytate in rolled oats; meal III contained the same quantity of phytate, as the sodium salt; meal IV contained approximately half as much rolled oats and phytate as meal VII; phytate was absent from meals II and V.
3. The following percentages of radioactive iron were absorbed from these meals:
(I) 4.43,
(II) 17.4,
(III) 1.74,
(IV) 9.81,
(V) 26.9,
(VI) 5.76 and
(VII) 8.84.

4. Milk reduced the absorption of iron by one-third. This was not due to the action of phytates, for the milk contained none.
5. Rolled oats and milk reduced the absorption of iron by two-thirds. Thus, rolled oats interfered no more than did milk.
6. There was no correlation between the phytate content of rolled oats and the reduction in iron absorption.
7. Sodium phytate reduced the absorption of iron by 15-fold, indicating that added soluble phytates can interfere with iron absorption.
8. The absorption of iron from the breakfast was one-fifth that from the water meal. Medicinal iron should be more effective if administered between meals.
9. Evidence is presented for the inverse correlation of iron absorption with the solids content of the test meals.


1 This research was supported by a grant from the Quaker Oats Company.

2 Present address: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N. Y.

3 Present address: Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, N. Y.

Manuscript received 22 November 1949.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. J. Gubler
Absorption and Metabolism of Iron
Science, January 20, 1956; 123(3186): 87 - 90.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]