Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Somers, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Somers, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, W. C.

Further Studies on the Relationship between Illumination and the Ascorbic Acid Content of Tomato Fruits

G. F. Somers, K. C. Hamner1 and W. C. Kelly

U. S. Plant, Soil, and Nutrition Laboratory, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, New York

Experiments with tomato plants grown in sand culture show that the amount of illumination of the fruits is of importance in determining their ascorbic acid content. Shaded fruits contain less ascorbic acid than comparable fruits exposed to sunshine. On the other hand, the amount of illumination received by the leaves for a few weeks prior to harvest apparently has much less effect, or possibly no effect at all, upon the ascorbic acid content of the fruits produced.

In view of this relationship, it would be expected that under field conditions where large differences in foliation were obtained at different locations there probably would be little or no correlation between the total amounts of sunlight at these locations and the ascorbic acid content of the tomatoes produced. The variation in the direct illumination of the fruits as a result of the differences in foliation probably would mask any possible effects resulting from variations in the illumination of the foliage. Data obtained from field experiments are presented to support this contention.


1 Present address: Department of Botany, University of California, Los Angeles.

Manuscript received 6 September 1949.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1950 by American Society for Nutrition