![]() |
|
|
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 2 and the Food Research Division, Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, Chicago, Illinois ,3
Animal experiments involving measurement of the growth performance of rats were conducted to determine the effect of supplemental methionine on diets containing a soybean trypsin inhibitor concentrate and in which the sources of nitrogen were raw or autoclaved soybean protein, soybean protein hydrolysate, or casein. When the soybean hydrolysate or casein was furnished in the diet, the depression in growth exerted by the trypsin inhibitor preparation was not related to interference with the availability of methionine for growth. The beneficial effect of methionine in this instance could be wholly accounted for by the fact that the hydrolysate and casein were deficient to some extent in this amino acid. With diets containing autoclaved soybean meal, the growth-retarding action of the inhibitor was referable to interference with the availability of methionine for growth, as well as to the deficiency observed in the case of the hydrolysate and casein.
These results may be explained by postulating a two-fold mode of action by active trypsin inhibitor preparations, one which results in an impairment of the availability of methionine for growth as a consequence of its antiproteolytic activity, and the other having an effect unrelated to the inhibition of proteolysis. The former can be demonstrated if the source of ingested N is an intact protein critically deficient in methionine. The latter effect is independent of the nature and quality of ingested N.
2 Contribution number 222 from the Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
3 This paper reports research undertaken in cooperation with the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, and has been assigned number 264 in the series of papers approved for publication. The views or conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors. They are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views or indorsement of the Department of the Army.
Manuscript received 13 June 1949.