Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 39 No. 1 September 1949, pp. 57-65
Copyright © 1949 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leverton, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gram, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leverton, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gram, M. R.

Nitrogen Excretion of Women Related to the Distribution of Animal Protein in Daily Meals1

Ruth M. Leverton and Mary R. Gram

Human Nutrition Research Laboratory, Department of Home Economics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

The nitrogen metabolism of 14 college-age women on a controlled diet which included no animal protein in the breakfast was compared with their nitrogen metabolism when the breakfast included 8 oz. of milk, although the total protein intake remained unchanged.

During period A, when no animal protein was included in the breakfast, the average daily urinary excretion for all subjects was 9.02 gm nitrogen, S.D. 0.410, as compared with 8.33 gm, S.D. 0.290, during period B when animal protein from 8 oz. of milk was furnished with the breakfast. The difference in urinary excretion was 0.69, S.E. 0.134. In period A the average daily nitrogen absorption was -0.4% as compared with 10.3% in period B. The average daily nitrogen retention was -0.03 gm in period A as compared with 0.96 gm in period B.

In view of the nature and significance of the findings, it is possible that the distribution of quantity and kind of protein in the three meals, as well as the total daily amount of protein, must be considered in determining protein requirements and utilization.


1 Published with the approval of the Director as paper No. 474, Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Dairy Council, Chicago, on behalf of the American Dairy Association.

Presented before the American Institute of Nutrition, Detroit, April 19, 1949.

Manuscript received 31 May 1949.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. A. GOLDSMITH and J. GIBBENS
RECENT ADVANCES IN NUTRITION: Review of the Literature, 1949-1950
Arch Intern Med, July 1, 1951; 88(1): 93 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]