Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 38 No. 3 July 1949, pp. 369-379
Copyright © 1949 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deuel, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Deuel, H. J., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, B.

Studies on the Comparative Nutritive Value of Fats

XII. The Digestibility of Rapeseed and Cottonseed Oils in Human Subjects1

Harry J. Deuel, Jr., Richard M. Johnson2, Clarence E. Calbert, Jane Gardner and Bioletta Thomas

Departments of Biochemistry and Nutrition, and of Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine and The Rancho Los Amigos, Los Angeles County Department of Institutions, 3 Los Angeles

1. The digestibility of rapeseed oil has been found to be 99% in normal men, while that of cottonseed oil was found to be 96.7% when the excretion of soap is also considered.
2. While the differences in values between these fats are only slight, they are apparently significant. They result from the somewhat greater excretion of soap in the cottonseed oil tests.
3. The results using rapeseed oil prove that a species difference obtains in respect to digestibility between man and the rat.
4. A basic diet containing a minimum quantity of fat was employed which avoids monotony and provides an appetizing and varied menu.


1 This work was done under a contract between the University of Southern California and the Research and Development Branch, Military Planning Division of the Office of the Quartermaster General, U. S. Army.

This paper reports research undertaken in cooperation with the Quartermaster Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces, and has been assigned number 247 in the series of papers approved for publication. The views or conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors. They are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views or indorsement of the Department of the Army.

Contribution no. 209 from the Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Southern California.

2 Address: Harriman-Jones Clinic, Long Beach, California.

3 We wish to thank Mr. W. R. Harriman, Director, and Dr. Douglas W. Ritchie, Medical Director, Rancho Los Amigos, for making arrangements for this study.

Manuscript received 9 March 1949.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]