The Basal Metabolism of Two Hundred and Eighteen Girls and Young Women of Southern Arizona, Fourteen to Twenty-Three Years of Age, Inclusive
One Figure
Ethel M. Thompson,
Elizabeth W. Cox and
Ada M. Ridgway
School of Home Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Arizona, Tucson
1. Basal metabolism determinations have been made on 218 girlsand young women of southern Arizona from 14 to 23 years of age,inclusive.
2. Calories per m2 per hour were calculated by4 methods ofevaluating individual tests: (1) average of resultsof all testswithin 5% of one accepted as a base line on atleast two mornings,(2) average of all tests, (3) first testsonly, (4) averageof tests on first mornings only.
3. Smoothedyearly means in calories dropped sharply by allmethods, bythe first method from 36.40 to 31.21 for the yearsfrom 14 to18, inclusive. Correlation with age was found tobe highly significantstatistically by the first two methodsand less significantby the other two. When reducing the trueyearly means to linearform, it was found that of the 4 methodsof evaluating individualtests the best straight line fit wasobtained by means of thesecond method and the next by the first.When the respectiveyearly means obtained by each of these twomethods were compared,no statistically significant differenceswere found althoughthose by the first were lower in each case.Variability aroundthe means was less by the second method.
4. Lumped means of31.1 and 31.5 calories were taken for thefirst two methods,respectively, for the years 18 to 23, inclusive.This low energylevel would seem to indicate the appearancein women at thistime of the zone of minimal metabolism demonstratedby Hardy,Milhorat and DuBois (41).
5. When the 18-year-oldgroup was compared with similar groupsof the same age reportedfrom 5 midwestern states, a diminishingmetabolism was observedwith increasing mean annual temperature.
6. The present studywas made at an altitude of 2400 feet. Ifaltitude per se tendsto increase basal metabolism, as someinvestigators have claimed,then the present low level of metabolismshould not have beenobserved. Therefore our data do not supportthis view.