Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 35 No. 3 March 1948, pp. 287-293
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harte, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sarich, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harte, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sarich, P.

The Effect on Rat Growth of Alternated Protein Intakes

One Figure

Robert A. Harte, John J. Travers and Peter Sarich

Research Laboratories, The Arlington Chemical Company, Yonkers 1, New York

1. Weanling rats grow as well, and utilize dietary protein with the same efficiency for growth whether it is supplied at a constant level in the diet or whether the level is alternated daily about the same value as a mean, provided the protein quality is constant (casein or wheat gluten).
2. Daily alternation of both quality and quantity of dietary protein, using wheat gluten and a protein hydrolysate, results in significantly poorer growth response but not significantly lowered protein efficiency.
3. The data suggest that prescribed dietary protein supplementation should be maintained constant to achieve maximum effectiveness from a given amount of supplement.


Manuscript received 30 October 1947.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]