Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 35 No. 1 January 1948, pp. 13-25
Copyright © 1948 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gall, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cowgill, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gall, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cowgill, G. R.

The Nutrition of the Mouse

II. Effect of Diet on the Bacterial Flora of the Intestine and the Cecum1

Lorraine S. Gall, Paul F. Fenton and George R. Cowgill

Yale Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Physiological Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

1. Microscopic and cultural examinations of the small intestine and the cecum of A strain mice on stock ration and 2 synthetic diets were carried out.
2. Mice fed each of these diets had a characteristic cecal flora; on the stock ration it consisted of a slender, gramnegative, curved rod; on the 2 synthetic diets cocci characterized each of them.
3. Coliforms were not found to be present in significant numbers on 2 of the diets and were found in large numbers in less than half of the mice on diet 101.
4. The mice on the stock diet had a larger bacterial population per gram of cecal contents and per cecum than the mice on synthetic diets. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups of mice on synthetic diets.
5. The weights of the cecal contents of the animals on stock ration were greater than those of the animals fed synthetic diets. There was little difference between the animals on synthetic diets with respect to weights of cecal contents.


1 Supported in part by the Nutrition Research Fund of this laboratory and in part by a grant from the American Cancer Society, on recommendation of the Committee on Growth of the National Research Council. The early experiments in this study were supported by grants from the Nutrition Foundation, Inc., and the Anna Fuller Fund.

Manuscript received 26 August 1947.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]