Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 33 No. 3 March 1947, pp. 319-330
Copyright © 1947 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bird, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Groschke, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bird, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Groschke, A. C.

An Inborn Characteristic Determining the Response of Chickens to a Diet Free of Animal Protein

Two Figures

H. R. Bird, Max Rubin and A. C. Groschke

Bureau of Animal Industry, Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, Maryland

Examination of the individual hatchability records of 183 hens which had been fed a diet containing no animal protein for a period of 11 lunar months revealed that 44% of the hens showed hatchability figures between 0 and 70%, 37% showed from 70 to 85% hatchability, and 19% showed from 85 to 100% hatchability. Further investigation revealed that the high hatchability maintained by the minority could not be explained on the basis of coprophagy, storage of the essential factor, or adaptation to an unfavorable diet.

Hens characterized by high and by low hatchability were not found to vary with respect to the growth promoting properties of their excreta or with respect to their efficiency of feed utilization.

The progeny of hens characterized by high, intermediate, and low hatchability, respectively, showed high, intermediate, and low viability and growth rate to 6 weeks of age. The effect of dietary supplements upon the growth of chickens varied with the maternal diets and with the ability of the dams to withstand dietary deficiency. This variation may be of considerable importance, especially in experiments in which the diets are variable because of their content of natural feedstuffs.

The variability among the hens is believed to have been inborn, as that of their progeny certainly was. Whether the variation of the progeny was congenital or hereditary cannot be stated on the basis of present evidence.


Manuscript received 23 September 1946.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]