Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 32 No. 6 December 1946, pp. 597-612
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murlin, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Murlin, J. R.

Biological Value of Proteins in Relation to the Essential Amino Acids Which They Contain

IV. The Analysis of Fifteen Protein Foods for the Ten Essentials1

Leslie E. Edwards, Robert R. Sealock, William W. O'Donnell, Grant R. Bartlett, Marion B. Barclay, Robert Tully, Rita H. Tybout, Jean Box and John R. Murlin

Department of Physiology and Vital Economics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

The methods used, and controls employed for their verification, in the analyses of fifteen high protein foods for the ten essential amino acids are described. Several of the methods available in the literature at the time this work was undertaken (September, 1943) after thorough trial, had to be discarded as inadequate. This was notably true of the electrophoretic method for separation of the three basic amino acids as well as the current colorimetric procedure for these acids singly and the oxidative method for determination of isoleucine, leucine and valine. Criticisms of these methods are given.

Of the final results presented in table 3, those which apply to corn germ and beefsteak represent closely the values used in paper III of this series for making up the mixtures of the essential amino acids in imitation of these two proteins. The principal discrepancies concerned leucine, which was nearly equally too high (4–5%) and valine equally too low (1.3%) in both foods. The biological values of the mixtures in these two instances, after correction for the unnatural isomers, were brought close to those of the proteins they imitated.

All methods which could be controlled by recoveries of the pure amino acids were so controlled and no procedures were adopted which did not give average recoveries of 95% or better.


1 This work was supported by generous grants from the Nutrition Foundation.

Manuscript received 21 August 1946.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]