Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 31 No. 3 March 1946, pp. 273-282
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rapp, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by McHargue, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rapp, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by McHargue, J. S.

The Nutritive Value of Tobacco-Seed Oil1

Two Figures

Karl E. Rapp, J. T. Skinner and J. S. McHargue

Department of Chemistry, Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Kentucky, Lexington

1. When tobacco-seed oil was fed to rats at levels of 5, 15 and 30% of the respective rations it gave an average coefficient of digestibility of 97.9 as compared with 99.1 and 98.2 for cotton-seed oil and butterfat, respectively.
2. With paired feeding of refrigerated rations containing 30% of tobacco-seed oil and butterfat, respectively, growth rates of rats did not differ significantly. When fed ad libitum, the difference in consumption of the two rations produced a greater rate of growth in rats fed butterfat.
3. Of six rats fed refrigerated ration and four animals fed non-refrigerated ration containing 30% tobacco-seed oil for 5 weeks, during the period when growth is usually maximum, all proved to be fertile upon reaching maturity.
4. Both temperature and surface area affected the rate of oxidation of the oil. When surface area was small, as in the case of the isolated oil, no particular care in storing was necessary; but when the oil was incorporated in a ration and kept for any length of time, refrigeration was necessary.


1 The investigation reported in this paper is in connection with a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published by permission of the Director.

Manuscript received 24 September 1945.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]