Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 30 No. 3 September 1945, pp. 169-173
Copyright © 1945 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. F.

Nutritional Studies on Milk Fat

I. The Growth of Young Rats Fed Milk Fat and Certain Synthetic Glycerides as Supplements to a Fat-Free Diet

Two Figures

J. L. Henderson, E. L. Jack, Samuel Lepkovsky and Della F. Reid

Division of Dairy Industry, University of California, Davis and Division of Poultry Husbandry, University of California, Berkeley

1. A fat-free diet is described in which all the components are pure compounds with the exception of casein extracted with alcohol and ether.
2. This diet was found to be satisfactory for use in the fat-nutritional experiments.
3. The rats on the milk-fat diet and on the triolein diet grew faster than those on the other diets. There was no significant difference between the milk-fat diet and the triolein diet with respect to their effect on growth.
4. Trilaurin, when fed at the level of 20%, enabled the rats to grow at about the same rate or slightly slower than the rats on a fat-free diet.
5. When 10% each of trilaurin and triolein were fed, the growth of the rats was intermediate between those receiving trilaurin and those receiving triolein.
6. The growth-promoting effects of the different diets could not be attributed to differences in feed consumption.


Manuscript received 9 May 1945.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]