Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 30 No. 1 July 1945, pp. 37-44
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stare, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hegsted, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stare, F. J.

Nutritional Studies with the Duck

I. Purified Rations for the Duck1,2,

Three Figures

D. M. Hegsted and F. J. Stare

Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, and the Department of Biological Chemistry, Harvard Medical School, Boston

1. The duck is an extremely rapidly growing animal and on an adequate ration gains approximately 40 gm. a day during the first 3 weeks of life with an efficiency of food utilization of 50%.
2. Good growth, but somewhat less than optimum, occurs on purified diets containing only liver extract as the crude material. The factor in liver extract is similar or identical to the eluate factor or factors required by the chick. As in the chick, a deficiency results in an anemia.
3. The duck is similar to the chick in that additional amino acids above those supplied by 18% casein are required for good growth. Gelatin is superior to casein as a source of these amino acids.
4. Biotin is required by the duck. No symptoms other than very poor growth were noted in this deficiency.


1 The work described in this paper was done under a contract recommended by the Committee on Medical Research between the Office of Scientific Research and Development and Harvard University.

2 Supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation.

Manuscript received 24 March 1945.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]