Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 29 No. 2 February 1945, pp. 143-154
Copyright © 1945 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. K.

The Effect of Succinylsulfathiazole and Phthalylsulfathiazole on the Bacterial Flora of Rat Feces

A. Kathrine Miller

Department of Pharmacology, Medical-Research Division, Sharp and Dohme, Inc., Glenolden, Pennsylvania

When a highly purified diet containing 0.5% to 2% succinylsulfathiazole or phthalylsulfathiazole was fed to rats over a long period of time there developed signs of nutritional deficiency which were corrected by the feeding of biotin and folic acid. The feeding of such sulfonamides also caused a decrease in the coliform count of the rat feces, but caused no significant change in the number of "total aerobes," "total anaerobes," or anaerobic spores in the feces. Lower levels of biotin, folic acid and pantothenic acid were excreted in the feces of rats fed diets containing the drugs than were excreted by rats fed the same diet without the drug.

Neither a sulfonamide-resistant nor a sulfonamide-sensitive strain of Escherichia coli synthesized as much folic acid when grown in the presence of sulfonamides as was synthesized during growth in a medium not containing the drug.


Manuscript received 28 August 1944.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]