QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boucher, R. V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Boucher, R. V.

Efficacy of Vitamin D from Different Sources for Turkeys¹

Two Figures

Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, The Pennsylvania State College State College

1. Different levels of vitamin D from four different sources, namely, U.S.P. reference cod liver oil no. 2, a sardine oil fortified with fish liver oils, an irradiated animal sterol, and irradiated 7-dehydrocholesterol were fed to poults as supplements to a rickets-producing diet during the first 4 weeks of life. All supplements were fed on the basis of their A.O.A.C. chick unit potency.

2. There were distinct differences in efficacy among the supplements, suggesting that the poult utilizes certain forms of vitamin D with degrees of efficacy that differ from the chick and in this response exhibits a higher degree of species specificity than the chick.

3. The vitamin D of the two irradiated products was distinctly more efficacious, on the basis of chick units fed, in increasing the ash content of the bones than the vitamin D of reference cod liver oil. Comparing the results obtained over the entire range of bone ash responses, this difference in efficacy is of the order of 2 to 1. While the fortified sardine oil was measurably more efficacious than the reference cod liver oil, it gave a response curve more nearly like that of cod liver oil than like the irradiated products.

4. It is concluded that the vitamin D potency expressed in A.O.A.C. chick units is not necessarily a true measure of the value of a vitamin D supplement for turkeys.

Manuscript received 20 December 1943.