Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 26 No. 1 July 1943, pp. 43-50
Copyright © 1943 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, H. G.

Nutritive Differences in Rations Containing Unhydrogenated or Hydrogenated Fats as Shown by Rearing Successive Generations of Rats

H. G. Miller

Procter and Gamble Company, Ivorydale, Ohio

Rats were fed the ordinary sterility ration composed of casein, dextrin, lard, cod liver oil, salt mixture and dried yeast supplemented, in some cases, with wheat embryo and, in other experiments, with small quantities of milk and fresh liver.

In these experiments nutrition was not improved by replacing the lard with unhydrogenated soybean oil. However, when partially hydrogenated soybean oil or partially hydrogenated cottonseed oil replaced the lard, there was a decided improvement in relation to the number of young which were born, the number of young which were weaned, and the breeding of successive generations of rats.

Hydrogenation does not destroy the vitamin E present in vegetable oils. Under conditions where oxidation may cause destruction of essential factors in the diet, use of hydrogenated oil is preferable to the use of unhydrogenated vegetable or animal fats.


Manuscript received 28 October 1942.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]