Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 25 No. 3 March 1943, pp. 285-293
Copyright © 1943 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemphill, F.
Right arrow Articles by Winters, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hemphill, F.
Right arrow Articles by Winters, J.

Nutritive Adequacy of Certain Low-Cost Food Mixtures1

Frances Hemphill, Ruth Adele Koenig and Jet Winters

Department of Home Economics, University of Texas, Austin

In an effort to find a combination of very cheap foods that might be used as a basis for the dietary in low-income groups, four food combinations, which had been calculated for adequacy and for which menus had been prepared, were assayed for certain vitamins and minerals; their adequacy for the rat was also tested. Two higher-cost food mixtures, designed for adequacy according to the suggestions of Carpenter and Stiebeling, and a stock ration for rats were similarly assayed and fed. Results showed that two of the low-cost food mixtures were similar to the higher-priced mixtures in their vitamin and mineral contents and in the growth response produced in animals. The cheaper food mixtures cost approximately half as much as the higher-priced ones.


1 Supported in part by a grant from the Texas State Board of Health.

Manuscript received 6 October 1942.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]