Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 22 No. 5 November 1941, pp. 483-489
Copyright © 1941 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snell, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Quarles, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Snell, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Quarles, E.

The Effect of Incubation on the Vitamin Content of Eggs

Esmond E. Snell and Ernestine Quarles

Department of Chemistry, University of Texas, Austin

The total amount of pantothenic acid and of riboflavin present in hen eggs does not change during incubation. The amount of biotin also remains constant or decreases somewhat. Nicotinic acid is synthesized by the chick embryo, so that the final amount present in the newly-hatched chick is over twenty times that originally present in the unincubated egg. Inositol likewise appears to be synthesized by the chick embryo. Presumably these synthetic powers of the embryo are retained by the chick. If this is so, it would indicate that nicotinic acid and inositol, unlike riboflavin, pantothenic acid and biotin, are not required in the diet of the chick. Whether such synthetic powers are sufficient to supply the needs of the chick for optimal or maximal growth is, of course, not determined by the present data.


Manuscript received 18 July 1941.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]