Effect of Choline and Other Supplements on Perosis
Two Figures
Thomas H. Jukes
Division of Poultry Husbandry, College of Agriculture, University of California, Davis
- 1. The addition of choline to a deficient basal diet, containing added manganese, prevented perosis in turkeys. Arsenocholine was also anti-perotic, but betaine was completely ineffective.
- 2. A number of vitamins and minerals were tested and all were found ineffective. However, an adequate supply of the vitamin B complex in the diet was found to be necessary for the full anti-perotic effect of choline to be exerted.
- 3. The anti-perotic effect of various feeding stuffs was studied. Soybean meal was fully effective at a level of 25%. Partial protection was obtained with either 17% of sardine meal, 5% of dried pork liver, or with 65% of barley. Some other feeds had a slight potency. The relation of the lecithin content to the anti-perotic activity of certain feeds is discussed.
- 4. Experiments with a simplified diet indicated that choline is essential for growth as well as for the prevention of perosis. An addition of 0.1% of choline was sufficient for growth, but insufficient for the prevention of perosis. An addition of 0.2% of choline protected against perosis. Betaine was neither growth-promoting nor anti-perotic. Inositol was ineffective.
- 5. The addition of a supplement to supply the "rice factor" did not promote growth in turkeys, which may indicate a difference between this species and the chick.
- 6. An experiment with chicks indicated that choline is essential for the prevention of perosis in this species also.
- 7. Biochemical possibilities arising from these observations are discussed briefly.
Manuscript received 10 August 1940.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. BELLOWS and H. CHINN
INTRAOCULAR HEMORRHAGES IN CHOLINE DEFICIENCY
Arch Ophthalmol,
July 1, 1943;
30(1):
105 - 109.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. SHILS and E. V. McCOLLUM
HANDBOOK OF NUTRITION: IX: THE TRACE ELEMENTS IN NUTRITION
JAMA,
October 24, 1942;
120(8):
609 - 619.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1940 by American Society for Nutrition