Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 18 No. 5 November 1939, pp. 489-500
Copyright © 1939 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. C.

Size and Basal Metabolism of the Adult Rabbit

Two Figures

Robert C. Lee

Nutrition Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Boston, Massachusetts

There is no known method of equalizing differences in the sizes of rabbits, which have a sevenfold range in adult weights, whereby a single value will accurately express the average basal metabolism of all rabbits. Within the rabbit species the relationship between basal metabolism and size is best expressed by referring the total heat production to the weight. For each kilogram increase in weight above 1 kg. up to 7 kg., the total heat production increases at a constant rate and can be predicted by the equation htotal=40W + 20, in which htotal represents kilogram-calories per 24 hours and W, the weight in kilograms. Other simple linear relationships between metabolism and size are found when the heat production is expressed per square meter of surface area and per Wn for values of n between 0.61 and 0.73, inclusive. The total heat production of the rabbit is slightly below the average metabolism of other warm-blooded animals of like weight, with the exception of the marmot. At 5 kg., its average heat production per square meter of surface area agrees with the general average for other warm-blooded animals, but at the lower weights it is below the general average.


Manuscript received 27 June 1939.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]