Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Abstracts

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. First published June 3, 2009; doi:10.3945/jn.108.102608
Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.108.102608
Vol. 139, No. 7, 1381-1386, July 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/7/1381    most recent
jn.108.102608v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meijers, J. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Halfens, R. J. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meijers, J. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Halfens, R. J. G.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Nutritional Epidemiology

Decreasing Trends in Malnutrition Prevalence Rates Explained by Regular Audits and Feedback1,2

Judith M. M. Meijers3,*, Math J. M. M. Candel4, Jos M. G. A. Schols5,6, Marian A. E. van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren7 and Ruud J. G. Halfens3

3 Department of Health Care and Nursing Science, 4 Department of Methodology and Statistics, and 5 Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands; 6 Tranzo Department, Tilburg University, Tilburg 5000 LE, The Netherlands; and 7 Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam 1007 MB, The Netherlands

To our knowledge, no studies have analyzed the influence of annual audit and feedback on the prevalence rates of malnutrition. This study analyzes the trend of malnutrition prevalence rates between 2004 and 2007 and the effects of previous audits and feedback from the annual Dutch National Prevalence Measurement of Care Problems (LPZ) and the effect of the participation in Dutch national improvement programs. From 2004 to 2007, an annual multicenter study was performed in Dutch hospitals, nursing homes, and home care organizations using a standardized questionnaire involving measurements at institutional, ward, and patient levels. The data were analyzed by logistic multilevel analysis. Nutritional status was assessed by BMI, undesired weight loss, and nutritional intake. In total, 80 hospitals, 141 nursing homes, and 48 home care organizations participated. The prevalence of malnutrition tended to decrease in hospitals and home care over the years. In nursing homes, prevalence rates were stable. Furthermore, the more often hospitals and home care organizations participated in the annual LPZ audits, the lower the prevalence rate of malnutrition (P < 0.001). Participation in national improvement programs also resulted in lower prevalence rates (P = 0.027). In conclusion, malnutrition prevalence rates have decreased over the last 4 y in hospitals and home care in The Netherlands. Participation in the LPZ and involvement in national improvement programs positively influenced these malnutrition prevalence rates, possibly indicating that increasing awareness and actively working toward improvement could be important in lowering these rates.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.meijers{at}zw.unimaas.nl.

Manuscript received 20 November 2008. Initial review completed 12 January 2009. Revision accepted 15 May 2009.

Published online 3 June 2009.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition