![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Lipid Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111; and 5 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111
Absorbed glucose and fructose differ in that glucose largely escapes first-pass removal by the liver, whereas fructose does not, resulting in different metabolic effects of these 2 monosaccharides. In short-term controlled feeding studies, dietary fructose significantly increases postprandial triglyceride (TG) levels and has little effect on serum glucose concentrations, whereas dietary glucose has the opposite effects. When dietary glucose and fructose have been directly compared at
20–25% of energy over a 4- to 6-wk period, dietary fructose caused significant increases in fasting TG and LDL cholesterol concentrations, whereas dietary glucose did not, but dietary glucose did increase serum glucose and insulin concentrations in the postprandial state whereas dietary fructose did not. When fructose at 30–60 g (
4–12% of energy) was added to the diet in the free-living state, there were no significant effects on lipid or glucose biomarkers. Sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) contain approximately equal amounts of fructose and glucose and no metabolic differences between them have been noted. Controlled feeding studies at more physiologic dietary intakes of fructose and glucose need to be conducted. In our view, to decrease the current high prevalence of obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes, the focus should be on restricting the intake of excess energy, sucrose, HFCS, and animal and trans fats and increasing exercise and the intake of vegetables, vegetable oils, fish, fruit, whole grains, and fiber.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ernst.schaefer{at}tufts.edu.
Published online 29 April 2009.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. P. Murphy The State of the Science on Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose: Summary and Issues to Be Resolved J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1269S - 1270S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Livesey Fructose Ingestion: Dose-Dependent Responses in Health Research J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1246S - 1252S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Jones Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose: Overview of a Workshop on the State of the Science J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1210S - 1213S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. White Misconceptions about High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Is It Uniquely Responsible for Obesity, Reactive Dicarbonyl Compounds, and Advanced Glycation Endproducts? J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1219S - 1227S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Moran Fructose and Satiety J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1253S - 1256S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Bantle Dietary Fructose and Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1263S - 1268S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Angelopoulos, J. Lowndes, L. Zukley, K. J. Melanson, V. Nguyen, A. Huffman, and J. M. Rippe The Effect of High-Fructose Corn Syrup Consumption on Triglycerides and Uric Acid J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1242S - 1245S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Marriott, N. Cole, and E. Lee National Estimates of Dietary Fructose Intake Increased from 1977 to 2004 in the United States J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1228S - 1235S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Stanhope and P. J. Havel Fructose Consumption: Considerations for Future Research on Its Effects on Adipose Distribution, Lipid Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in Humans J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1236S - 1241S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||