Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. First published April 29, 2009; doi:10.3945/jn.108.098186
Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.108.098186
Vol. 139, No. 6, 1257S-1262S, June 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
139/6/1257S    most recent
jn.108.098186v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dansinger, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dansinger, M. L.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Supplement: The State of the Science on Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose

Dietary Fructose and Glucose Differentially Affect Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis1–3,

Ernst J. Schaefer4,*, Joi A. Gleason4 and Michael L. Dansinger5

4 Lipid Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111; and 5 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111

Absorbed glucose and fructose differ in that glucose largely escapes first-pass removal by the liver, whereas fructose does not, resulting in different metabolic effects of these 2 monosaccharides. In short-term controlled feeding studies, dietary fructose significantly increases postprandial triglyceride (TG) levels and has little effect on serum glucose concentrations, whereas dietary glucose has the opposite effects. When dietary glucose and fructose have been directly compared at ~20–25% of energy over a 4- to 6-wk period, dietary fructose caused significant increases in fasting TG and LDL cholesterol concentrations, whereas dietary glucose did not, but dietary glucose did increase serum glucose and insulin concentrations in the postprandial state whereas dietary fructose did not. When fructose at 30–60 g (~4–12% of energy) was added to the diet in the free-living state, there were no significant effects on lipid or glucose biomarkers. Sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) contain approximately equal amounts of fructose and glucose and no metabolic differences between them have been noted. Controlled feeding studies at more physiologic dietary intakes of fructose and glucose need to be conducted. In our view, to decrease the current high prevalence of obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes, the focus should be on restricting the intake of excess energy, sucrose, HFCS, and animal and trans fats and increasing exercise and the intake of vegetables, vegetable oils, fish, fruit, whole grains, and fiber.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ernst.schaefer{at}tufts.edu.

Published online 29 April 2009.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. P. Murphy
The State of the Science on Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose: Summary and Issues to Be Resolved
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1269S - 1270S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. Livesey
Fructose Ingestion: Dose-Dependent Responses in Health Research
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1246S - 1252S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. M. Jones
Dietary Sweeteners Containing Fructose: Overview of a Workshop on the State of the Science
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1210S - 1213S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. S. White
Misconceptions about High-Fructose Corn Syrup: Is It Uniquely Responsible for Obesity, Reactive Dicarbonyl Compounds, and Advanced Glycation Endproducts?
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1219S - 1227S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. H. Moran
Fructose and Satiety
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1253S - 1256S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. P. Bantle
Dietary Fructose and Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1263S - 1268S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. J. Angelopoulos, J. Lowndes, L. Zukley, K. J. Melanson, V. Nguyen, A. Huffman, and J. M. Rippe
The Effect of High-Fructose Corn Syrup Consumption on Triglycerides and Uric Acid
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1242S - 1245S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. P. Marriott, N. Cole, and E. Lee
National Estimates of Dietary Fructose Intake Increased from 1977 to 2004 in the United States
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1228S - 1235S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. L. Stanhope and P. J. Havel
Fructose Consumption: Considerations for Future Research on Its Effects on Adipose Distribution, Lipid Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in Humans
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1236S - 1241S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition