Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Nutr. First published April 1, 2009; doi:10.3945/jn.109.104653
Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.109.104653
Vol. 139, No. 6, 1054-1060, June 2009

This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplemental Material
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
139/6/1054    most recent
jn.109.104653v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burdge, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, M. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burdge, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, M. A.
© 2009 American Society for Nutrition


Biochemical, Molecular, and Genetic Mechanisms

Folic Acid Supplementation during the Juvenile-Pubertal Period in Rats Modifies the Phenotype and Epigenotype Induced by Prenatal Nutrition1–3,

Graham C. Burdge4,*, Karen A. Lillycrop5, Emma S. Phillips6, Joanne L. Slater-Jefferies6, Alan A. Jackson4 and Mark A. Hanson6

4 Institute of Human Nutrition, 5 Development and Cell Biology, and 6 Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK

Prenatal nutritional constraint is associated with increased risk of metabolic dysregulation in adulthood contingent on adult diet. In rats, folic acid supplementation of a protein-restricted (PR) diet during pregnancy prevents altered phenotype and epigenotype in the offspring induced by the PR diet. We hypothesized that increasing folic acid intake during the juvenile-pubertal (JP) period would reverse the effects of a maternal PR diet on the offspring. Rats were fed a control (C) or PR diet during pregnancy and AIN93G during lactation. Offspring were weaned on d 28 onto diets containing 1 mg [adequate folate (AF)] or 5 mg [folic acid-supplemented (FS)] folic acid/kg feed. After 28 d, all offspring were fed a high-fat (18% wt:wt) diet and killed on d 84. As expected, offspring of PR dams fed the AF diet had increased fasting plasma triglyceride (TAG) and β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) concentrations. The FS diet induced increased weight gain, a lower plasma βHB concentration, and increased hepatic and plasma TAG concentration compared with AF offspring irrespective of maternal diet. PPAR{alpha} and glucocorticoid receptor promoter methylation increased in liver and insulin receptor promoter methylation decreased in liver and adipose tissue in FS compared with AF offspring, with reciprocal changes in mRNA expression irrespective of maternal diet. These findings show that increased folic acid intake during the JP period did not simply reverse the phenotype induced by the maternal diet. This may represent a period of plasticity when specific nutrient intakes may alter the phenotype of the offspring through epigenetic changes in specific genes.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.c.burdge{at}southampton.ac.uk

Manuscript received 14 January 2009. Initial review completed 24 February 2009. Revision accepted 5 March 2009.

Published online 1 April 2009.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. A. Cox and P. W. Nathanielsz
The importance of altered gene promoter methylation and transcription factor binding in developmental programming of central appetitive drive
J. Physiol., October 15, 2009; 587(20): 4763 - 4764.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by American Society for Nutrition